Hi everyone,
First of all, thank you so much for trying out the demo and sharing your thoughts.
Over the past days, I’ve received several pieces of feedback that were genuinely valuable, especially around how spells are written, read, and evaluated in play.
I want to share a bit of thinking about what I learned, and what I’m planning to improve next.
What does an “elegant spell” actually mean?
In The Sigil Engine, spells are not just a way to reach the goal — they are meant to express how you think.
From feedback and observation, one recurring question stood out:
“How do I know if my solution is good, not just correct?”
In our world, elegance can be expressed in two very concrete dimensions:
Number of spell lines
Energy consumption
To make this clearer, I’m planning to add explicit feedback at the end of each level, showing how your spell performed along these dimensions.
This will likely take the form of a small chart or visual summary after level completion.
(Still work-in-progress, sharing a preview once it’s ready.)
The goal is not to judge the player, but to give a clearer sense of why one solution feels cleaner than another.
Clearer structure in spells (indentation & brackets)
Another common pain point was readability, especially once spells start using loops and conditionals.
When logic grows, it should still be easy to answer:
Which block does this loop belong to?
Where does this if actually end?
To address this, I’m improving indentation and visual alignment, so that:
Loop and if brackets are more clearly associated with their inner blocks
Nested logic reads more like a structured system, and less like a flat list
This is a small change visually, but it makes a big difference when reasoning about more complex spells.
Clearer UI hints for world elements
Finally, several players mentioned uncertainty around what certain grid elements actually do.
To reduce guesswork, I’m adding hover-based UI hints:
Hovering over an element will show a short description
This applies directly on the grid map, without opening separate panels
The intent here is to let players focus on problem-solving, instead of memorizing rules.
What’s next
All of the above are clarity and feedback improvements, not changes to core mechanics.
My current focus is to make sure the demo communicates its ideas as cleanly as possible, especially for first-time players.
Thanks again for all the thoughtful feedback. It genuinely helps shape where the game goes next.
Soda Elephant